‘Generation Rent’ needs greater security of tenure

It was interesting to read on Monday the new research from Halifax bank which asked eight thousand 20 to 45 year olds if they planned to buy a house. It revealed that nearly two thirds of them are giving up on the dream of buying a home completely. It seems that the prohibitive size of the deposit needed today, combined with the tough nature of the mortgage process is deterring them.

It seems evident that the UK will follow Europe and become a nation of renters, but there are some glaring problems ahead for ‘Generation Rent’. Currently, there is a shortage of good quality accommodation for rent which is pushing up rental prices and this is making it hard for renters to save. Just 5% of young people are currently saving with 95% stating they have no interest in saving a deposit or they are trying but failing to save.

Another big problem that will face ‘Generation Rent’ is the lack of security of tenure in today’s rental market. On a standard assured shorthold tenancy agreement, tenants can be evicted at short notice by landlords. This lack of security will become a big worry for tenants – particularly those with families or those who are elderly.

Security of tenure makes renting an attractive alternative to homeownership. In Germany, the average tenancy agreement runs from five to ten years and consequently renting is commonplace and viewed without stigma. Girlings Retirement Rentals offer private properties to rent for the over 55s with assured (life-long) tenancy agreements and have seen tenant numbers increase threefold in the past five years. Our tenants say that security of tenure is their number one priority because it provides the security and peace of mind that is so essential in later life.

Clearly ‘Generation Rent’ will need support both from the government to help develop a greater number of quality homes to rent at affordable prices. However, they will also need support from private landlords who may need to rethink their tenure agreements. Perhaps when this happens renting will not be seen as such a bad thing and even an advantage.

Energy efficient properties may help counterbalance higher energy costs

There has been a flurry of bad economic news recently. Inflation rose to 4.5% in April and the Bank of England downgraded its economic report and predicted that inflation will rise this year to 5%. The Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, stressed that the UK faces uncertain and difficult times ahead and blamed the rise in inflation on the increase in VAT to 20% in January, as well as higher energy prices and increases in import prices.

For the majority of people and in particular the retired population, these economic reports will make uncomfortable and worrying reading. The elderly population has been hit already with high cost of food and rising energy prices. The continued low interest rates have also ensured that interest on any savings in recent months has been negligible. To add to the gloom, Centrica, the owner of British Gas, stated that the rising price of wholesale gas will result in price hikes in customer bills next winter.

The cost of energy is becoming an increasingly important issue for buyers and tenants. Energy Saving Trust last week criticised the government’s Energy Performance Certificates for being complex and urged Estate agents to display a property’s annual energy bill on its particulars when it is advertised. The Trust wants home energy consumption to be as transparent and easily understood as miles-per-gallon for cars so consumers can choose properties with the lowest bills. It highlighted the huge variations in energy bill prices on properties of similar sizes, depending on factors such as insulation and boiler efficiency. It said that the combined gas and electricity bill for a four-bedroom house ranged from £700 to £2,300 a year.

I agree with the Trust. There needs to be greater transparency in the housing industry about energy efficiency levels. The rising energy prices will mean that energy efficiency will inevitably become a factor in the negotiations of buyers and tenants in the future. We know this is a major issue already for our tenants. For the past few years, we have taken various steps to reduce their utility bills by making our rental properties as energy efficient as possible. A number of developments have received energy efficient makeovers with lofts and in some cases cavity walls insulated and energy efficient light bulbs and draught excluders installed. Our tenants can rest assured that we will be continuing to invest in energy efficient initiatives ahead of next winter. Let’s hope this will provide a little respite from all this bad news.

Housing benefit cuts – we offer the over 60s a life line

In response to the housing benefits cuts that took effect on 1st April 2011 and on top of tight economic constraints, we are now offering two year fixed assured shorthold tenancies at lower rents on selected properties across the UK, with no rent review until 2013.

Many of these assured shorthold tenancies will be offered at rents that are up to 20% less than the assured (life long) tenancy equivalent. At the end of the two year term, our tenants will have the chance to upgrade to an assured (life long) tenancy which gives the tenant the right to live in the property for as long as they wish.

We believe that this move will make private renting a more affordable and viable alternative for many over 60s currently living in social housing who are faced with the prospect of having to find more rent as a consequence of the government’s cuts.

The government’s new housing measures will cut £2.4bn off the housing bill and save the taxpayer an estimated £1bn by 2013/4. Social housing tenants will be expected to meet any shortfall in rent, which the government says will create a greater incentive for them to work as well as create a fairer tax system. However, many over 60s are not in a position to go out to work and are on fixed incomes.

Consequently, we think the housing benefits cuts are totally irresponsible as far as retired people are concerned and ill thought through. Pensioners cannot go out and earn money to top up their rents and many of them will now be extremely worried about their future.

In recent months rising inflation levels, food prices and VAT has seen the cost of living soar for the elderly. The low interest rates have diminished returns on any savings, so people can’t rely on the interest on savings to supplement their pensions either. These housing benefit cuts will come as a serious financial blow to the over 60s in receipt of housing benefits. We hope that by realigning our rents we are offering some of them an alternative housing option.

Additionally, all service charges and maintenance costs are included , which normally covers the provision of a house manager on site, 24 hour help line for emergencies, as well as a communal lounge, gardens, a guest room and laundry facilities. An assured (life long) tenancy gives the tenant the right to live in the property for as long as they wish.

A modest boost for housing with few incentives for private rental sector

It was clear from yesterday’s budget that Mr Osborne has taken note of the urgent need to boost the UK’s stagnating property market.

Several of his announcements will bring some relief to different first time buyers, home owners with mortgages and potentially, private landlords.

The announcement of a £250m FirstBuy programme will see the government and house builders jointly offer loan help for first-time buyers purchasing newly-built homes. Buyers will need to save a deposit worth 5% of their property’s value, with the government and house builders putting up 10% each through an equity loan, enabling people to qualify for 75% loan-to-value mortgage. The equity loan would be interest-free for the first five years, with interest charged at 1.75% in year six, and at inflation plus 1% thereafter.

Whilst this is good news for first time buyers, the scheme will only help an estimated 10,000 buyers as it is focuses on new builds only, the scheme is open for a year only and most importantly, depends on the banks’ willingness to offer credit to first time buyers something which hasn’t been forthcoming in recent months.

Homeowners struggling with mortgage repayments will have some relief too as government will extend support for mortgage interest payments for another year.

There was some good news on planning with the government announcing it will pilot land auctions, which will incentivise local authorities to release land for development. But this will take time and is dependent on local authorities agreeing to release land at affordable rates.

Finally, there was an effort to improve the availability of good-quality, privately rented properties with the announcement of a reform of the process for calculating stamp duty payments. Rather than using the existing method, stamp duty on bulk purchases of multiple homes will now be based on the average cost, potentially allowing professional landlords to invest in a greater number of properties to rent out to tenants.

However, whilst these moves will undoubtedly help some people, the measures are modest and selective. The government’s housing crisis was not just caused by a market that was inaccessible for first time buyers; there is an urgent need for good quality housing in the UK for families and the retired, amongst others. Missing from the budget were any targeted measures to encourage the growth of the UK’s Private Rented Sector to accommodate these people.

Such measures might include a reduced and flat rate of stamp duty on acquisitions regardless of the size of the transaction, or a beneficial rate of CGT for individual tax payers if their investment property is available for letting for more than three years.

So whilst there were concessions to the housing industry, there weren’t enough. The Chancellor has only scratched the surface and until other problems are addressed, the housing crisis will not be solved.

When will government get ‘it right’ on housing?

I wish I could be more confident about the news that Civil servants in the Communities and Local Government department will review the private housing market, whilst Labour is also to carry out one of its own after admitting that it failed the market during its administration.

Having worked in housing for over thirty years, I have witnessed consecutive governments – conservative, labour and now the coalition government failing to recognise the problems in housing which have grown to new and worrying levels.

Analysing what has gone wrong in housing can only be a good thing, but this review is long overdue. The problems in housing today are numerous and complex and the use of the word ‘crisis’ to describe the current mess is justified entirely.

Five million people are waiting for social housing; there is a major shortage of affordable homes and homeless figures look set to rise – a problem that will worsen when local authority housing benefit cuts start to bite.

Meanwhile, the private rental sector has been asked to step in and lower rents – bailing out the government and making up the rental shortfalls. But why should they? Rents need to increase to reflect the value of property. Only when rents are realistic will institutional landlords invest in the sector and even then it may be dependent on tax incentives being introduced. Furthermore, if the negative reactions from landlords attending the British Property Federation housing conference this week are a true reflection of the sector, this is simply not going to happen.

Another ticking time bomb is the shortage of family housing in cities, as well as the shortage of suitable retirement homes for the elderly – another problem that will worsen given the UK’s rapidly ageing population.

To solve the crisis a number of different factors need to be addressed. Local Authorities need to release the land in their ownership to experienced companies who can build appropriate housing on it. And the land would need to be leased at a peppercorn rent to keep land costs down and rents affordable.

There is also an obvious solution to the shortage of family homes in the UK that has been overlooked. A growing number of retired people live in large under occupied housing. If they could sell their homes and rent suitable and affordable retirement housing they would free up much needed family housing. In doing so they would be able to release capital for investment and help fund their retirement, which would also help solve the government’s growing pensions crisis. However, people won’t move from such homes whilst there is so little decent high quality retirement accommodation available.

What is needed is a government-backed programme to build purpose built retirement homes for rent. Brownfield land in inner cities and towns would be ripe for such development, enabling this age group to live near shops, medical facilities, libraries, bus routes and the local amenities on which they depend. If appropriate retirement housing was built on this kind of land then retired people might be tempted to move there from their under-occupied homes.

However, before any action can be taken the Country’s Town Planners need to be taken to task. Quite frankly they are not fit for purpose. Until they start to work with and not against developers nothing is likely to happen.

I have lobbied several housing ministers over the years with my formula and have been encouraged by them to prove the concept works. I can only hope that Oliver Letwin will take on board these suggestions and that he listens too to the views of experts in the industry. The government needs to ensure that the outcome of this review results in well thought through and realistic ways to solve these complex issues and find solutions quickly.

Government admits Housing Crisis, but ignores solution to solve it

It has been a grim start to the New Year for the housing industry, with Housing Minister Grant Shapps admitting a housing crisis exists in the UK. And with five million people on waiting lists for social housing, the number of homeless set to rise and a shortage of affordable housing, it does appears that UK housing is in chaos and the coalition government is short of ideas.

The government wants to build more affordable homes with affordable rents, but land prices are prohibitive. The Department for Communities and local government has pledged to spend £4.5bn to deliver 150,000 new affordable homes over the next four years. But is this really the only and most cost effective solution to the crisis?

I approached Grant Shapps and several of his predecessors with a workable formula that would solve the crisis. I suggested that Local Authorities should release land in their ownership to companies with the experience of building appropriate housing. This land should remain in Local Authority ownership and then be leased at a peppercorn rent to keep costs down and rents affordable. Only with the land cost removed would rents be affordable.

There is also an obvious solution to the shortage of family homes in the UK. Currently, a growing number of retired people live in large under occupied housing that would make perfect family homes. If these people were able to sell their homes and rent suitable and affordable retirement housing they would free up much needed family housing. In addition, they would release capital which could be invested and help fund their retirement, which would also help solve the government’s growing pensions crisis.

But there is also a huge shortage of suitable retirement housing, so why would they move? To overcome this problem, a government-backed programme is needed to build purpose built retirement homes for rent. Brownfield land in inner cities and towns should be developed which would be perfect for this age group who need to be near shops, medical facilities, libraries, bus routes and local amenities. If this happened, many of them would be tempted to move from their under-occupied homes.

One thing is clear; this problem isn’t going to go away. The waiting lists for housing are increasing and the retired population is increasing year on year with the numbers of people over 55 years old forecast to reach 20 million in the next 25 years. My solution would help the housing needs of both groups of people.

The above formula was discussed and/or presented to, in written form to many persons including Sir George Young, Senior Civil Servants in John Prescott’s Office, seven years ago, and other Minister of Housing, too numerous to mention in the last New Labour administration and more recently Eric Pickles and Grant Shapps; all of them with the exception of Sir George Young who when he was Minister of Housing, encouraged me to prove the concept works, have failed to address the housing needs of the country. What does it take to convince these people a solution exists, but it needs a responsible approach and a firm understanding of the problems?

Financial Institutions are interested in investing in the housing market they just need to be satisfied that the funds they are responsible for are invested wisely. Come on the Coalition, you need to take action to solve this crisis.

Spending Review

Entitlement to appropriate housing is one of the most fundamental needs of our society – the cuts to social housing and the decision to increase rents to 80% of those in the local private market is going to place a huge financial burden on the more vulnerable, and puts even more pressure on the private rental sector.

We have an increasingly ageing population and the government needs to introduce a sound flexible housing policy to recognise this. Pensions do not necessarily provide an adequate income on which to retire, so the older generation in particular need support and the option to rent affordable housing. As such, we need thousands of new retirement homes to rent on assured tenancies throughout the UK.

With land values so high, Public Authorities should be encouraged to release brownfield sites for development on long leases to blue chip companies able to provide this much-needed housing at affordable rents. If the private sector had more institutional investment, they could deliver the housing stock that the country needs, without the grants RSLs have become used to – if grants aren’t paid to RSLs, the government can then afford to pay market rents.

Encouragement should also be given to retired people living in under-occupied family homes to move into more appropriate purpose built retirement homes and housing which offers quality, security and companionship, thus leaving behind loneliness and the burden of the up-keep of a large family home. This frees up more family housing for those who need it, helps to keep house prices stable, and releases the individual’s capital to fund their retirement needs. Both public and private sector family homes being released can also be reallocated to homeless families.

Renting vs buying

There has been much speculation in the press in recent weeks based upon the ‘renting vs buying’ debate following a report from the Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH). The report states that the era of the owner-occupier may be in decline, with millions facing a lifetime as tenants rather than freeholders and urges the government to turn its attention to the needs of those in the private rented sector.

Many of the press articles that followed focused on the plight of first time buyers, who now have to amass a deposit of around £35,000 to climb onto the ladder, and therefore, renting has become the norm for 30-somethings who simply can’t raise the funds to buy.

But what about the other end of the property ‘ladder’? Renting has also become another option when the time comes to downsize, however for those who have owned a property for 30-40 years, renting may seem quite alien- home ownership has become ingrained in the British psyche. Yet renting in retirement can make perfect financial sense; keeping your capital flexible, allowing you access to cash when you might need it – for example in the event of illness – and easing the burden of inheritance tax.

One of the other concerns for those changing from owning to renting is security – no one wants to feel that they could be on notice to leave, particularly in their later years. Girlings offer life-long assured tenancies for retiree renters, which mean that the tenant can stay in their rented home for as long as they like. An Assured tenancy eliminates many of the stresses associated with renting, which is important in the precious years of retirement.

When it comes to deciding where to live, what’s important is that it feels like home and is safe and secure, and perhaps if there was more emphasis on long term renting, it would become more of the norm as it is in many of our European counterpart countries. We certainly think that long term tenancies should become the norm in all private rented accommodation.

The active retired flocked to the Retirement Show

There was a real buzz at London’s Retirement Show last weekend. This was our fourth consecutive year exhibiting and this year’s show seemed busier than ever, with thousands of visitors and a greater number of exhibitors offering everything today’s active retired might need – from elaborate climbing holidays, to line dancing, Tai Chi and cookery, through to financial advice.

The popularity of the show can no doubt be attributed to the fact that for the first time in history there are more pensioners than children in the UK – 11.58 million men over 65 and women over 60, compared to 11.52 million under-16s and we are all living longer and healthier retirements than in previous years. By 2034, 22 per cent of us will be over 65 years old, so the boom in the retirement market will continue.

But whilst the show depicted retirement years as being inspirational and a time for people to discover new and exciting activities , as well as the chance to spend the kid’s inheritance now, there were serious undertones. All this fun needs serious financial consideration and, as the recent financial crisis showed, there just aren’t any fail safe investments any more.

It was little wonder therefore that competing with the queues for the climbing walls were people scrambling for places at seminars from the likes of Prudential offering financial advice, and companies like us offering advice about how to live well and cost-effectively in retirement.

Our main advice to people interested in renting in retirement was to look at all their housing options and seek expert independent advice about how they should best fund and live in retirement before making life changing decisions. But we also stressed that people need to think ahead and assess not just their needs at 65, when climbing holidays still appeal, but later in life in their 80s and 90s when their needs will be different – this means that issues such as the length and security of tenure, having a house manager on site and access to a 24 hour help line might become the most important factors in any decision.

Gillian Girling, Director, Girlings Retirement Options

More imagination and investment in private rental sector needed

The emergency budget brought mixed blessings for the property industry. The rise in capital gains tax (CGT) from 18% to 28% will hit buy to let landlords hard if they decide to sell in the next few years, but not if they are looking at property as a long term investment. And, things could have been far worse. In the run up to the budget experts had predicted CGT rises of 40 or 50%.

Let’s not forget too that Landlords received a boost earlier this month when Housing Minister, Grant Shapps, announced he will be scrapping plans to introduce a national register for private landlords and regulate managing and lettings agents. However, this news was dampened somewhat this week when over 25 MPs signed an Early Day Motion calling for the private rented sector to be fully regulated, despite Shapps’s announcement.

More regulation and red tape is exactly what we don’t need right now. The majority of lettings agents are regulated already by industry bodies including the Association of Residential Lettings Agents (ARLA) and the Property Ombudsman and licensed by bodies such as the National Approved Letting Scheme. Such accreditations demonstrate the quality of service letting agents provide to their tenants and it is a shame that a few rogue landlords are giving the rest of the industry a bad name.

Strikingly, the budget did not really contain any positive news for the private rental industry. In many UK areas there is a real shortage of good quality housing for many groups of people, including the retired, and we would like to see the government introduce targeted measures to encourage the growth of the Private Rented Sector in these regions to accommodate these people.

Such measures might include a reduced and flat rate of stamp duty on investment property acquisitions regardless of the size of the transaction. This would help to encourage institutional and corporate investment in the sector. We would also like to see a beneficial rate of CGT for individual tax payers if they make their investment property available for letting for more than, say, three years.

The budget also lacked imaginative thinking about ways to encourage investment in the Private Rented Sector. This will be particularly important over the next few years as we will see continued growth in demand for properties from groups of people including the retired and also possibly from people working in the public sector given the planned pay freezes and anticipated job cuts.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.